This site has reached End of Life and will be taken down and removed on 01 Feb 2021.
It is strongly recommended that any material you would like to retain is downloaded before this date.

Understanding digital domains in arts learning & teaching

The virtual learning environment (VLE) at University of the arts London (UAL) is quickly becoming an accepted norm for delivering the UAL online L&T experience, best practice examples provide clear and simple pathways for those using & embedding digital tools in L&T. Conversely the institutionally managed VLE can be seen as constraining or inadequate in meeting the needs of some individuals & courses (read more about this here).

How do we reconcile these differences?

Making sense of the current digital L&T landscape is complicated, there are so many different factors involved, clearly there's more to L&T then the institutional managed tools and spaces. To help illustrate and explore the different perspectives across the agile landscape of digital L&T at ​Camberwell, Chelsea & Wimbledon (CCW) colleges of arts, (departmental, student, staff, discipline, course, programme, college and the sector) I have adapted the cynefin sense-making framework.

Below are four domains of the Cynefin framework: Simple, Complicated, Complex and Novel, we move between these domains as we situate and understand digital L&T practice. If we don't know which domain we belong (disorder) we need to decide what action is best appropriate to apply to the situation to move forwards: Categorise, Analyse, Probe or Stabalise. I have added opposites on each side of the framework to help highlight the differences between grassroots & institutional approaches and in curriculum and non curriculum dependencies.

The ideal domains to operate are within the top two quadrants, complex & complicated domains, although we should operate within the simple/best practice if we have good reason to apply 'best practice', we should resist applying too many constraints or becoming too complacent within the simple/best practice domain when applying best practice.    

Managing turbulence and understanding digital domains in arts learning & teaching

CCW Baseline:

Based on previous experience and conversations with staff and students over the past few months I've identified a baseline/starting point in which to help understand and base future discussions around what we mean by digital learning and teaching enhancement, the CCW baseline list includes:

UAL digital tools, services & processes: 

  • VLE feedback: Students & staff     
  • VLE support: CCW approaches to IT VLE & TEL support & change management  
  • Guidance & terms of reference: Resources & documentation - does CCW need a VLE Strategy?  
  • Communication: Explore cross college, course, departmental communication.

Digital learning & teaching enhancement: 

  • Staff development: Joined up approach in delivery of IT/TEL training formal & informal   
  • Manage change: Support integration of new software & hardware changes & new policies or processes  
  • Innovation & experimentation of digital L&T (hardware, software and changes in L&T practice& curriculum)  
  • Digital L&T spaces: support curriculum integration & improvement of digital technical & academic spaces, resources & support.  

Online learning and teaching and curriculum enhancement:

  • Blended learning: approaches & benefits realisation  
  • Part & fully online curriculum development(open & closed): Discussions, pilot projects & low risk experimentation around the concepts & issues.  
  • Sector/tech industry partnerships& collaborations in online learning: Online tool & environment design & development.  

Using the above list we could see the three areas as being located in following domains in general terms:

Simple - VLE, tools & services: constrained & supports best practice but possible complacency.

Complicated - L&T enhancement: support several different ways of doing things, expertise required in specific areas of practice.   

Complex/Novel – Online learningWhere emergent practice takes place, safe-fail experiments.

In the below illustration I’ve included a radius of three areas VLE, L&T enhancement and Online learning to help highlight our current position as well as the potential to move between the different domains we may inhabit.

How the current landscape may look:

How this may apply to the online learning landscape:

How do we support complicated and emergent learning and teaching practice in HE? 

The Cynefin framework does a great job of helping us identify gaps in the agile landscape, but equally important it helps us appreciate and accept all the different domains of digital L&T practice that work well.

The mapping process clearly highlights the imbalance between (safe/simple) curriculum dependent/institutionally led and supported TEL (technology enhanced learning) and grassroots (complicated/complex) influenced TEL, an issue I aim to highlight and explore over the next few months.    

Also see: Online learning at Camberwell Chelsea & Wimbledon Colleges of Art (CCW)


Chris Follows

Digital Learning Technologies Manager

CCW Learning and Teaching Enhancement (LTE)

University of the Arts London

Twitter: @CCWPostDigital


Average: 3 (1 vote)
1127 reads
Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International
This Work, Understanding digital domains in arts learning & teaching, by cfollows is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International license.